Seidner writes rubbish: see previous blog entry - which will be rewritten soon.
See comments below.
gs
Thanks ........
You are too generous.
However look at my comments to another reader earlier: I will have to
rewrite the relevant post on my blog.
My comments – although far too prolix and lacking clarity – may have
fascinated you because it plainly had some merit. It needs to be better than it
was.
Regards,
..............
Geoff
########################################################################
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 10:36 AM
To: ...........
Subject: UNADULTERATED CLAPTRAP FROM
GS
Hi ...........,
Thanks for your comments. The item posted
to my blog below was indeed badly written: it took me far too long to prepare.
Although you can note the minimal excuse of the links: they remain a great
read.
And I was too keen to finish it – to be ‘done with it’!
It is a classic example that from time to
time I can effectively write unadulterated rubbish!
It will be rewritten when I have time –
soon I guess. The original will remain as an example of perhaps merely the above!
Never have I used an exclamation marks
with such justification!
Regards
Geoff Seidner
Thank you but I am now completely confused!
.........
##################################################
Hi Geoff,
It is certainly much better than the emails
previously sent. Sorry that it took you ages.
Your letter, though marred by "typos" (see
attached) does point out the fence-sitting stance of the article's
author.
Have a happy New........ Year.
Regards,
...............
----- Original Message -----From: g87To: ...............Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:36 AMSubject: This took me 'ages'!!!Hi .........This is much better than yesterday’s private note...which really never was...was never posted on my blog.RegardsGeoff
No comments:
Post a Comment