Friday 20 December 2013

It was a dark and stormy night for ECAJ overnight!

It was a dark and stormy night for ECAJ overnight!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_was_a_dark_and_stormy_night

Articles herein make the ECAJ position more absurd.
Even with due consideration to the inevitable duplication in my efforts - particularly the links - on any reasonable reading it is expected that they will find a way of backing down with the esteemed brilliant Attorney General George Brandis and perhaps the similar Tim Wilson!

Geoff Seidner

SEE A MINI ESSAY BELOW... to be completed one day soon..
In response to the pathetic letter from Lee Rhiannon yesterday.
http://cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/no-hate-for-israel-rhiannon-1912.html

See  letter here:
http://cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/rhiannons-motives-great-letter-2012.html

GS
#########################################################
#########################################################
LINKS FROM TODAY MAINLY:
 December (40)

#####################################################
#####################################################
20 Dec  2013 work in progress

''You cannot criticise Israel without being accused of 
anti semitism.'' 

The above mealy - mouthed excuse for Jew hatred is often
 used by antagonists of Israel to outrageously diminish Jews' right to
 their homeland. 
Structurally the words may change; but essentially our enemies identify
 themselves via this pathetic contrived canard. It is about time
 that it was debunked and exposed for what it is: a chimera;  a plain derivative of 
  • Jew hatred.
  •  Plain old antisemitism.
  •  Anti Zionism. 
Take your pick: it is a grave error to suggest there is any real difference

The title of this essay is a relatively  recent inculcation in media  and is seemingly difficult to rebut
 because it is set up via  the not so obvious classical paradox.
  1. Criticism is reasonable
  2. Vitiating any criticism is unreasonable.
  3. Therefore criticism of Israel is reasonable.
  4. Thus any criticism of Israel  is extended given credibility / license!
  5.  It plainly, indubitably follows on, non?
NON!!!
It is a surprisingly how effective this ruse  has become - a non sequitur that hails
 from the dubious idea that an apple is a fruit, a pear is a fruit therefore a pear is
 an apple. 1

My main concern is that reasonable people who rail against the obvious deceit herein
 do not know how to respond.

Intelligent, brilliant aggression is the way to rebut it. This seems to be one one
hand obvious and sadly misplaced on the basis that I am suggesting that they
will listen to reason. Indeed inveterate haters will not.

But that misses the point. Completely.
It is a lot better to attack than what is often proffered by our people:

Too often I hear the phrase 'that you can
 indeed criticise Israel but it has to be 
'reasonable' and she must not be held to a
 standard higher / not expected of other
 people / countries'. Sigh! A certain loser that 
by it's very nature almost encourages a distorting rejoinder.


The above is sadly utterly inadequate simply because not
 only is it weak, but our antagonists gleefully ignore
 it. And Abuse it in the way they abuse all good - faith
 comments from reasonable people. Manifestly because 
it lends itself to innumerable distortions.

 It should not surprise that the case for Israel is lost
 via the inevitable rejoinder by those who brutalize the
 naive with innumerable tripe and deliberate lies. 
Indeed - it is easy to get around the 'standard 
response' because it lends itself to mealy - mouthed
 attacks.

THIS IS THE BEST IDEA _ HARDLY
 RECOGNIZED AS SUCH: IT BEATS
 ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!

SO I VERILY SAY:  Impeach the integrity, motivations
 and modus vivendi of those who
 proffer the above plain nonsense.

Challenge them to make single discrete claims
 without shifting ground when that claim is proven
 false.

Put to them that the so - called 'criticism of Israel' is
 merely their modern - day derivated justification 
for their very being - Jew hatred.

Challenge them:  so many excellent sources for
 proving that Jew Hatred /
 anti semitism / anti Zionism and  so - called 
criticism - of -  Israel are essentially the same. 
One needs merely to  read what the late,
great Martin Luther King Jnr. espoused.



Note that there are multiple sources for MLK associating anti - Zionism 
with AS: but classical distortion is manifest in claims that one of
the sources may have been 'suspect.' There are adequate sources
for his wonderful words. See links above.



The best argument... cont. here...

The argument to postulate is plainly predicated on
 the eternal idea that one must impeach and 'attack'
 the antagonist - whose motivations are indeed
 suspect.Willfully - blind is an elegant phrase.

It is as simple as that: accept that it is not merely a
matter of claiming truth in a defacto debate: you have
 to take use the aggression / best form of defence 
tactic.
And impeaching the enemy / activist can be simple 
as 'bashing' them with perhaps a few of the below.
Do not accuse me of over - complicating it: some or

most may be adequate.
TO BE CONTINUED
GS

No comments:

Post a Comment